| Page 171 | Kisaco Research

The EPO’s decision in G2/21 was meant to bring clarity, but questions around plausibility standards remain unsettled. This panel will assess how national courts and the EPO are applying the doctrine and the implications for life sciences patents.


• Compare approaches to plausibility in the UK, Netherlands, and EPO post-G2/21.
• How are national courts diverging from or aligning with the EPO's reasoning?
• Explore how plausibility has been tested in key cases including Apixaban and Dapagliflozi.
• Understand the vulnerability of life sciences patents under current plausibility thresholds and discuss the risks of invalidation, and how should companies adapt?
• Discuss the comparative written description and enablement standards in China and the latest case law which may affect your global litigation strategy.

Author:

Jin Ooi

Partner
Kirkland & Ellis

Jin Ooi

Partner
Kirkland & Ellis

Author:

Corinna Sundermann

Senior Vice President Intellectual Property
Fresenius Kabi

Corinna Sundermann

Senior Vice President Intellectual Property
Fresenius Kabi

Author:

Eva Ehlich

Partner
Maiwald

Eva Ehlich

Partner
Maiwald

Author:

Guido Pontremoli

Vice President Global IP
Chiesi

Currently employed as global Head of the IP department-Patent at Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, managing and coaching a team of experienced patent attorneys, patent searchers and administrators, working on the protection, enforcement, litigation and/or opposition of the Chiesi IP, aligned with business decisions.

 

Before joining Chiesi, I worked in IP groups of big pharma companies (GSK Vaccine, and Bracco Imaging) as senior patent attorney responsible for all the IP aspects concerning some key R&D projects. I also had experience as patent counsel in private practices, dealing with pharma, chemical and bio entities.

Graduated in chemistry from the Univ of Milan, with a PhD in medicinal chemistry and a post-doc experience in USA, I am qualified EPA and chartered Italian patent attorney.

Guido Pontremoli

Vice President Global IP
Chiesi

Currently employed as global Head of the IP department-Patent at Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, managing and coaching a team of experienced patent attorneys, patent searchers and administrators, working on the protection, enforcement, litigation and/or opposition of the Chiesi IP, aligned with business decisions.

 

Before joining Chiesi, I worked in IP groups of big pharma companies (GSK Vaccine, and Bracco Imaging) as senior patent attorney responsible for all the IP aspects concerning some key R&D projects. I also had experience as patent counsel in private practices, dealing with pharma, chemical and bio entities.

Graduated in chemistry from the Univ of Milan, with a PhD in medicinal chemistry and a post-doc experience in USA, I am qualified EPA and chartered Italian patent attorney.

Author:

James Zhu

Partner
JunHe LLP

James Zhu

Partner
JunHe LLP

Author:

Camila Vislie

Partner
Thommessen

Camila Vislie

Partner
Thommessen

Injunctions can be decisive in life sciences patent litigation, particularly in fast-moving markets. This session delivers a strategic overview of recent developments in preliminary injunctions across the UPC, Europe, and the United States, helping patent holders and challengers alike prepare for high-stakes enforcement in 2025. With a cross-border perspective, expert speakers will unpack emerging trends, legal thresholds, and jurisdictional contrasts shaping the availability and strength of injunctive relief.

• Explore the latest PI case law from the UPC, key EU countries, and the USA and how it impacts pharma and biotech strategies.
• Understand practical approaches for securing or resisting injunctions in different jurisdictions, including timing, evidence, and risk assessment.
• Gain actionable insights on how PI outcomes are influencing broader litigation and market entry planning in the life sciences.

Author:

Michal Porubsky

Senior Litigation Counsel
Novo Nordisk

Michal Porubsky

Senior Litigation Counsel
Novo Nordisk

Author:

Richard Roberts

Partner
Potter Clarkson

Richard Roberts

Partner
Potter Clarkson

Author:

Selin Sinem Erciyas

Partner
Gun & Partners

Selin Sinem Erciyas

Partner
Gun & Partners

Author:

Matthew O’Neill

Director of European IP
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

Matthew O’Neill

Director of European IP
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

Author:

Paul Ainsworth

Director
Sterne Kessler

Paul Ainsworth

Director
Sterne Kessler

Author:

David Por

Partner
Clifford Chance

David Por

Partner
Clifford Chance

Author:

Lauren Baker

Associate
Barnes & Thornburg

Lauren Baker

Associate
Barnes & Thornburg

Author:

John Cox

Partner
Barnes & Thornburg

With deep knowledge of issues facing the life sciences industry, John Cox counsels clients regarding their worldwide intellectual property rights and represents their patent interests when litigation arises, particularly regarding pharmaceutical, chemical, and biotechnology matters. John takes his role in protecting these important assets of life science innovators very seriously while approaching each matter with enthusiasm.


Through his ability to communicate effectively and succinctly, John advises on, develops, and carries out global IP strategies for the benefit of innovative companies, his clients, who are focused on developing core assets that save and improve the lives of patients. John enjoys leveraging his unique ability to put together targeted and enduring teams for each matter – paying close attention to each person’s strengths and skillsets and how they fit with one another, alongside his highly specialized experience and thoughtful and responsive nature.
John is intimately familiar with the pharmaceutical industry, having dealt with patent and IP subject matter ranging from brain chemistry, the gastrointestinal system, drug delivery systems and treatments of rare diseases and cancer to medical diagnostic methods, the generation of biofuel using bacteria, and processes for manufacturing chemicals and pharmaceutical products. He also has almost two decades of experience in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) cases, including pre-litigation investigations.

John offers guidance from the first step of a matter through to resolution, including all aspects of litigation. He has extensive experience related to discovery and motion practice, as well as in developing offensive and defensive strategies. He is well versed in dealing with complex subject matter and technical witnesses, such as inventors and experts.


John adeptly helps clients navigate the crossroads of foreign business practices and the complexities of U.S. patent practice, having worked with foreign pharmaceutical, chemical, and biotechnology companies throughout his career.

John Cox

Partner
Barnes & Thornburg

With deep knowledge of issues facing the life sciences industry, John Cox counsels clients regarding their worldwide intellectual property rights and represents their patent interests when litigation arises, particularly regarding pharmaceutical, chemical, and biotechnology matters. John takes his role in protecting these important assets of life science innovators very seriously while approaching each matter with enthusiasm.


Through his ability to communicate effectively and succinctly, John advises on, develops, and carries out global IP strategies for the benefit of innovative companies, his clients, who are focused on developing core assets that save and improve the lives of patients. John enjoys leveraging his unique ability to put together targeted and enduring teams for each matter – paying close attention to each person’s strengths and skillsets and how they fit with one another, alongside his highly specialized experience and thoughtful and responsive nature.
John is intimately familiar with the pharmaceutical industry, having dealt with patent and IP subject matter ranging from brain chemistry, the gastrointestinal system, drug delivery systems and treatments of rare diseases and cancer to medical diagnostic methods, the generation of biofuel using bacteria, and processes for manufacturing chemicals and pharmaceutical products. He also has almost two decades of experience in Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) cases, including pre-litigation investigations.

John offers guidance from the first step of a matter through to resolution, including all aspects of litigation. He has extensive experience related to discovery and motion practice, as well as in developing offensive and defensive strategies. He is well versed in dealing with complex subject matter and technical witnesses, such as inventors and experts.


John adeptly helps clients navigate the crossroads of foreign business practices and the complexities of U.S. patent practice, having worked with foreign pharmaceutical, chemical, and biotechnology companies throughout his career.

This roundtable examines the PTAB’s evolving approach to discretionary denials in IPR and PGR proceedings, Participants will share practical strategies for timing, forum selection, and petition design to improve survivability in an increasingly hostile U.S. post-grant landscape

Author:

Rob Cerwinski

Partner
Gemini Law

Rob Cerwinski

Partner
Gemini Law

Author:

Mike Cottler

Partner
Gemini

Mike Cottler

Partner
Gemini

Author:

Mariusz Kondrat

Managing Partner
Kondrat & Partners

Mariusz Kondrat

Managing Partner
Kondrat & Partners

Author:

Dawid Sierzant

Partner
SDP Sierzant Dudzinski

Dawid Sierzant

Partner
SDP Sierzant Dudzinski

Author:

Chris Dudzinski PhD

Partner
SDP Sierzant Dudzinski

Chris Dudzinski PhD

Partner
SDP Sierzant Dudzinski